Tue. Dec 3rd, 2024

Hunter Biden prosecutor pushes back on president’s politicization claim

By 37ci3 Dec2,2024



On Monday, the office of special counsel David Weiss pushed back on the president Joe Biden‘s claim was the prosecution of Hunter Biden politically motivatedcalled such claims “groundless”.

In a lawsuit challenging Hunter Biden’s request to dismiss the California indictment against him in light of his father’s indictment. Sunday night amnestyWeiss noted that a number of judges have already rejected the younger Biden’s retaliatory harassment claims.

Referring to the cases that resulted in the conviction of President Weiss, who declared a “full and unconditional” amnesty, he said, “I have watched my son be prosecuted selectively and unfairly.” gun charges Delaware and Hunter Biden pleaded guilty tax and fraud charges in California.

“I believe in the justice system, but in fighting it, I also believe that crude politics have permeated the process and it has led to a miscarriage of justice,” Biden said.

in the year lawsuitWeiss’s office did not directly mention the president’s statement, but noted that Hunter Biden had filed eight motions to dismiss the California indictment, “making every argument as to why it should be dismissed, all of which he ruled to be without merit.”

“It should be noted that the defendant claimed that the indictment was the product of retaliation and selective prosecution. The court rejected this claim.[a]As he stated at the court hearing, the suspect submitted his motion without any evidence.’ And there is and has been no evidence of retaliation or selective prosecution in this case,” the petition states.

It noted that Hunter Biden “made similar baseless allegations” in the Delaware case, which were dismissed by the same judge. Three appeals court panels also rejected Hunter Biden’s arguments.

“In all, eleven (11) different Article III judges appointed by six (6) different presidents, including her father, have heard and dismissed defendant’s claims, including allegations of selective and retaliatory prosecution,” the petition states.

In documents On Sunday night, Hunter Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, argued that the president’s pardon “requires the automatic dismissal of the indictment” against his client.

Weiss argued in the California filing and a separate filing in Delaware that courts typically “do not dismiss indictments when pardons are granted.”

“The government does not object to the defendant receiving clemency. That does not mean that the grand jury’s decision to indict him based on a finding of probable cause should be dismissed as if it never happened.” the Delaware file he said.

“It also does not mean that his charges should be dismissed because the defendant falsely stated that the charges were the result of some improper motive or selective prosecution. No court has agreed with the defendant with these baseless claims or his motion to dismiss the charges. The indictment does not find any support in the law,” he added.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Lowell responded to Weiss’ petition late Monday, arguing that the judge had the right and reason to dismiss the underlying indictment.

“Mr. Biden has not been convicted and no sentence has been entered in this case. Since no sentence has been or will be entered in this case, the appropriate order is to dismiss the Indictment, noting that it is a pardon,” Lowell wrote.

Hunter Biden was scheduled to be arraigned in both cases later this month.



Source link

By 37ci3

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *